æ—¥æœ¬åŒ–å¦æ©Ÿæ¢°è£½é€ æ ªå¼ä¼šç¤¾ã¯ã€åŒ–妿©Ÿå™¨ã‚’è‡ªç¤¾å·¥å ´ã«ã¦è£½é€ ã§ãã‚‹ãƒ—ãƒ©ãƒ³ãƒˆã‚¨ãƒ³ã‚¸ãƒ‹ã‚¢ãƒªãƒ³ã‚°ä¼æ¥ã§ã™ã€‚
è‡ªç¤¾å·¥å ´ã¯ã€é«˜åœ§ã‚¬ã‚¹è¨å‚™ã€åœ§åЛ容噍ã€ã¾ãŸç‰¹æ®Šæï¼ˆè€é£Ÿææ–™ï¼‰ã®è£½ä½œã‚‚å¯èƒ½ã§ã€ææ–™æ‰‹é…ã‹ã‚‰ç´å…¥ã¾ã§ä¸€æ‹¬ç®¡ç†ã‚’行ã£ã¦ã„ã¾ã™ã€‚ãƒ—ãƒ©ãƒ³ãƒˆã¯æ§˜ã€…ãªè£…ç½®ã€æ©Ÿå™¨é¡žã®çµ„ã¿åˆã‚ã›ã§æ§‹æˆã•れã¦ãŠã‚Šã€ã‚¨ãƒ³ã‚¸ãƒ‹ã‚¢ãƒªãƒ³ã‚°ã«ã¯å¤šãã®çŸ¥è˜ã¨çµŒé¨“ãŒå¿…è¦ã¨ã•れã¾ã™ã€‚
ã¾ãŸã€æ™‚代背景?外部環境ã®å¤‰åŒ–ã«ä¼´ã„プラントã«å¯¾ã™ã‚‹ãŠå®¢æ§˜ã®ãƒ‹ãƒ¼ã‚ºã‚‚多種多様ã«å¤‰åŒ–ã—ã¦ã„ã¾ã™ã€‚ è¨å‚™ã®æŠ±ãˆã‚‹æ§˜ã€…ãªå•題ã®è§£æ±ºã€çœã‚¨ãƒãƒ«ã‚®ãƒ¼ã€ç’°å¢ƒå¯¾ç–ã€ç”Ÿç”£åŠ¹çŽ‡ã€å“質å‘ä¸Šã€æ–°è£½å“生産ã®ãƒ—ãƒã‚»ã‚¹æ§‹ç¯‰?è¨å‚™è¨ˆç”»ã®å…·ç¾åŒ–ã«ã‚ˆã‚ŠãŠå®¢æ§˜ã®äº‹æ¥ä¾¡å€¤å‘上ã®ä¸€åŠ©ã¨ãªã‚‹ã¹ãã€æœ€æ–°ã®æŠ€è¡“ã®é–‹ç™ºã€æ´»ç”¨ã«åŠªã‚ã¦ãŠã‚Šã¾ã™ã€‚ 常ã«ãŠå®¢æ§˜ã®ç«‹å ´ã«ãªã‚Šã€å®‰å…¨ã§åŠ¹çŽ‡çš„ãªè¨å‚™ã®æ§‹ç¯‰ã‚’念é ã«å–り組んã§ãŠã‚Šã¾ã™ã€‚
-
THREE:CHAPTER XL. OF THE TREASURY.In proportion as punishments become milder, clemency and pardon become less necessary. Happy the nation in which their exercise should be baneful! Clemency, therefore, that virtue, which has sometimes made up in a sovereign for failings in all the other duties of the throne, ought to be excluded in a perfect system of legislation, where punishments are mild and the method of trial regular and expeditious. This truth will appear a hard one to anybody living in the present chaotic state of the criminal law, where the necessity of pardon and favours accords with the absurdity of the laws and with the severity of sentences of punishment. This right of pardon is indeed the fairest prerogative of the throne, the most desirable attribute of sovereignty; it is, however, the tacit mark of disapproval that the beneficent dispensers of the public happiness exhibit towards a code, which with all its imperfections claims in its favour the prejudice of ages, the voluminous and imposing array of innumerable commentators, the weighty apparatus of unending formalities, and the adhesion of those persons of half-learning who, though less feared than real philosophers, are really more dangerous. But let it be remembered that clemency is the virtue of[191] the maker, not of the executor, of the laws; that it should be conspicuous in the code of laws rather than in particular judgments; that the showing to men, that crimes may be pardoned and that punishment is not their necessary consequence, encourages the hope of impunity, and creates the belief that sentences of condemnation, which might be remitted and are not, are rather violent exhibitions of force than emanations of justice. What shall be said then when the sovereign grants a pardon, that is, public immunity to an individual, and when a private act of unenlightened kindness constitutes a public decree of impunity? Let the laws therefore be inexorable and their administrators in particular cases inexorable, but let the law-maker be mild, merciful, and humane. Let him found his edifice, as a wise architect, on the basis of self-love; let the general interest be the sum of the interests of each, and he will no longer be constrained, by partial laws and violent remedies to separate at every moment the public welfare from that of individuals, and to raise the appearance of public security on fear and mistrust. As a profound and feeling philosopher let him allow men, that is, his brethren, to enjoy in peace that small share of happiness which is given them to enjoy in this corner of the universe, in that immense system established by the First Cause, by Him Who Is.
経験ã¨å®Ÿç¸¾ã‚’ã‚‚ã¨ã«ã€ãŠå®¢æ§˜ã®ãƒ‹ãƒ¼ã‚ºã«å¿œã˜ãŸæœ€é©ãªä»•様?システムを構築ã€ã”ææ¡ˆã„ãŸã—ã¾ã™ã€‚
-
THREE:The second consequence is, that the sovereign, who represents society itself, can only form general laws, obligatory on all; he cannot judge whether[125] any one in particular has broken the social compact, for in that case the nation would be divided into two parties, one represented by the sovereign, asserting the violation of such contract; the other by the accused, denying the same. Hence the necessity of a third person to judge of the fact; in other words, of a magistrate, whose decisions shall simply consist of affirmations or denials of particular facts, and shall also be subject to no appeal.
å·¥å ´å»ºå±‹ã€äº‹å‹™æ‰€æ£Ÿã€å€‰åº«ã€è©¦é¨“棟ãªã©ã®å»ºè¨ã‚‚一括ã—ã¦ã”ä¾é ¼ã„ãŸã ã‘ã¾ã™ã€‚
-
THREE:Another way to prevent crimes is to reward virtue. On this head I notice a general silence in the laws of all nations to this day. If prizes offered by academies to the discoverers of useful truths have caused the multiplication of knowledge and of good books, why should not virtuous actions also be multiplied, by prizes distributed from the munificence of the sovereign? The money of honour ever remains unexhausted and fruitful in the hands of the legislator who wisely distributes it.CHAPTER XXX. THEFTS.
環境ã«é…æ…®ã—ã€ã‚³ã‚¹ãƒˆãƒ¡ãƒªãƒƒãƒˆã‚’勘案ã—ãŸã€çœã‚¨ãƒãƒ«ã‚®ãƒ¼ã§ã€çœã‚¹ãƒšãƒ¼ã‚¹ãªè¨å‚™ã‚’ã”ææ¡ˆã„ãŸã—ã¾ã™ã€‚
-
THREE: From the simple consideration of the truths hitherto demonstrated it is evident that the object of punishment is neither to torment and inflict a sensitive creature nor to undo a crime already committed. Can he, whose function it is, so far from acting from passion, to tranquillise the private passions of his fellows, harbour in the body politic such useless cruelty, the instrument either of furious fanatics or of weak tyrants? Shall perchance the shrieks of an unhappy wretch call back from never-receding time actions already executed? The object, therefore, of punishment is simply to prevent the criminal from injuring anew his fellow-citizens, and to deter others from committing similar injuries; and those punishments and that method of inflicting them should be preferred which, duly proportioned to the offence, will produce a more efficacious and lasting impression on the[166] minds of men and inflict the least torture on the body of a criminal.
高圧ガスè¨å‚™ã€åœ§åЛ容噍ã®è£½é€ è³‡æ ¼ã‚’æŒã£ãŸè‡ªç¤¾å·¥å ´ã§ã®è£½ä½œã«ã‚ˆã‚Šã€å“質ã€ç´æœŸã‚’管ç†ã—ã¦ãŠã‚Šã¾ã™ã€‚
-
THREE:The opponents of capital punishment may fairly, therefore, draw an argument in their favour from the fact that so many parts of the world have found it not incompatible with the general security of life to erase the death penalty from their list of deterrent agencies. It is better to rely on so plain a fact than on statistics which, like two-edged weapons, often cut both ways. The frequency of executions in one country and their total absence in another may severally coexist with great numerical equality in the number of murders committed in each. It is always better, therefore, to look for some other cause for a given number of murders than the kind of punishment directed to their repression. They may[45] depend on a thousand other things, which it is difficult to ascertain or eliminate. Thus both in Bavaria, where capital punishment has been retained, and in Switzerland, where it had been abolished in 1874, murders have increased greatly in recent years; and this fact has, with great probability, been attributed to the influence of bad habits contracted during the Franco-German war.English philosophy and legislation, therefore, owe enough to Beccaria for his treatise never to be forgotten among us. Standing, as it does, in reference to law as Bacon¡¯s ¡®Novum Organon¡¯ to science, or Descartes¡¯ ¡®Principia¡¯ to philosophy, and representing a return to first principles and rejection of mere precedent in the matter of penal laws, it will never fail to gratify those who, with little admiration for law in the concrete, can yet find pleasure in studying it in the abstract. Most men will turn readily from a system built up, as our own is, of unintelligible distinctions, and based on authority rather than on experience, to a system where no distinctions exist save those which are derived from the nature of things and are founded on the real differences that distinguish the moral actions of mankind.
コストをç©ç®—ã—ã€è¦‹ç©ä¾¡æ ¼ã‚’ã”æç¤ºã—ã¾ã™ã€‚å›žåŽæœŸé–“法ãªã©ã®è¨å‚™æŠ•資ã®çµŒæ¸ˆæ€§è¨ˆç®—ã‚’ãŠå®¢æ§˜ã¨ã”一緒ã«ã‚·ãƒŸãƒ¥ãƒ¬ãƒ¼ã‚·ãƒ§ãƒ³ã™ã‚‹ã“ã¨ã‚‚å¯èƒ½ã§ã™ã€‚
-
THREE:[32]
化å¦å·¥å ´ã¸ã®ç´å…¥å®Ÿç¸¾ãŒå¤šãã€å„種法è¦ã«ã‚‚精通ã—ã¦ã„ã¾ã™ã€‚官åºç”³è«‹æ›¸é¡žã®ä½œæˆã‚‚サãƒãƒ¼ãƒˆã„ãŸã—ã¾ã™ã€‚
-
THREE:The voice of a philosopher is too feeble against the noise and cries of so many followers of blind custom, but the few wise men scattered over the face of the earth will respond to me from their inmost hearts; and, amid the many obstacles that keep it from a monarch, should truth perchance arrive in spite of him at his throne, let him know that it comes there attended by the secret wishes of all men; let him know that before his praises the bloody fame of conquerors will be silenced, and that posterity, which is just, will assign him the foremost place among the pacific triumphs of a Titus, an Antonine, or a Trajan.
ç¤¾å†…ã«æ§˜ã€…ãªãƒ†ã‚¹ãƒˆè£…置をãã‚ãˆã¦ãŠã‚Šã¾ã™ã®ã§ã€äº‹å‰ã®æ¤œè¨¼ã‚‚å¯èƒ½ã§ã™ã€‚
新製å“ã®ç”Ÿç”£ãƒ—ãƒã‚»ã‚¹ã®æ§‹ç¯‰ã‚‚ã”相談ãã ã•ã„。
プラントã®è¨ˆç”»æ™‚ã‹ã‚‰ã€è¨è¨ˆã€èª¿é”ã€å»ºè¨ã€è©¦é‹è»¢ã€æ›´ã«ã¯å®Œæˆå¾Œã®ãƒ¡ãƒ³ãƒ†ãƒŠãƒ³ã‚¹ã«è‡³ã‚‹ã¾ã§ãƒˆãƒ¼ã‚¿ãƒ«ã«å¯¾å¿œã„ãŸã—ã¾ã™ã€‚å½“ç¤¾ã¯æ©Ÿå™¨è£½ä½œå·¥å ´ã‚’所有ã—ã¦ãŠã‚Šã¾ã™ã®ã§ã€ç´°ã‚„ã‹ãªæ©Ÿå™¨è¨è¨ˆ?製作ãŒå¯èƒ½ã§ã™ã€‚
-
FORE:å·¥å ´å»ºè¨ã€ãƒ—ラント新è¨ã®è¨ˆç”»ã®ç«‹æ¡ˆã«ã¯ã€å¤§ããªåŠ´åŠ›ã‚’è¦ã—ã¾ã™ã€‚当社ã§ã¯ã€ãŠå®¢æ§˜ã®ä¸€åŠ©ã¨ãªã‚‹ã¹ãã€å®˜åºå±Šã‘出ã®åŠ©æˆã‚’行ã„ãªãŒã‚‰ã€å·¥å ´å»ºè¨ã‚’進ã‚ã€æŠ±ãˆã¦ãŠã‚‰ã‚Œã‚‹å•題ã®è§£æ±ºã«å–り組んã§ãŠã‚Šã¾ã™ã€‚
-
FORE:ä¸»è¦æ©Ÿå™¨ç‰ã®ä»•様を決定ã—ã€ãƒ—ラントã®åŸºæœ¬ãƒ•ãƒãƒ¼ã‚„é…置を決定ã—ã¾ã™ã€‚
-
FORE:Such was the reasoning which for nearly half a century governed the course of English history, and which for all that time it was a heresy to dispute.è¨å‚™ã®æ§‹æˆè¦ç´ ã®è©³ç´°ãªä»•様やé…置を決定ã—ã€å›³é¢ã‚’作æˆã—ã¾ã™ã€‚
-
FORE:2. When the proofs of a fact all depend equally on a single one, their number neither increases nor diminishes the probability of the fact in question, because their total value resolves itself into that of the single one on which they depend.詳細è¨è¨ˆã«åŸºã¥ããƒãƒ³ãƒ—や部å“類ã®è³¼å…¥å“ã®èª¿é”先をé¸å®šã—ã€ç™ºæ³¨ã—ã¾ã™ã€‚
プラントを構æˆã™ã‚‹ä¸»è¦ãªæ©Ÿå™¨ã¯ç‰¹æ³¨è£½ä½œãŒå¤šãã€ææ–™ç™ºæ³¨ã€è£½ä½œã€å„種検査ã€é‹æ¬ã¾ã§å·¥ç¨‹ã€ç´æœŸã‚’管ç†ã—ã¾ã™ã€‚ -
FORE:安全を第一ã«ã€ç®¡ç†æŠ€è¡“者ãŒè²¬ä»»ã‚’æŒã£ã¦æ–½å·¥ã€å·¥ç¨‹ã€å“質ã®ç®¡ç†ã‚’行ã„ãªãŒã‚‰å”力会社ã¨é€£æºã—進ã‚ã¦ã„ãã¾ã™ã€‚
土木?å»ºç¯‰ã€æ©Ÿå™¨æ®ä»˜ã€é…管ã€é›»æ°—?è¨ˆè£…ã€æ–熱ãªã©ã®å·¥äº‹ãŒã‚りã¾ã™ã€‚ -
FORE:プラント完æˆå¾Œã€æ€§èƒ½ãŒå‡ºã‚‹ã‹è©¦é‹è»¢ã‚’行ã£ã¦ç¢ºèªã€èª¿æ•´ã‚’行ã„ã¾ã™ã€‚
ãã‚ç´°ã‚„ã‹ãªé‹è»¢æŒ‡å°Žã«ã‚ˆã‚Šå®Ÿé‹è»¢ã¸ã®ã‚¹ãƒ ースãªç§»è¡Œã‚’促ã—ã¾ã™ã€‚完æˆå›³æ›¸ã¨å…±ã«ãŠå¼•渡ã—ã¨ãªã‚Šã¾ã™ã€‚
é‹è»¢?ä¿å®ˆãƒ•ェーズ
-
FORE:ãƒ—ãƒ©ãƒ³ãƒˆã€æ©Ÿå™¨ã®å®‰å…¨ã¨å®‰å®šç¨¼åƒã®ãŸã‚ã«ã€å®šæœŸçš„ãªãƒ¡ãƒ³ãƒ†ãƒŠãƒ³ã‚¹ã‚’ãŠè–¦ã‚ã„ãŸã—ã¾ã™ã€‚
-
FORE:But if penal laws thus express the wide variability of human morality, they also contribute to make actions moral or immoral according to the penalties by which they enforce or prevent them. For not[74] only does whatever is immoral tend to become penal, but anything can be made immoral by being first made penal; and hence indifferent actions often remain immoral long after they have ceased to be actually punishable. Thus the Jews made Sabbath-breaking equally immoral with homicide or adultery, by affixing to each of them the same capital penalty; and the former offence, though it no longer forms part of any criminal code, has still as much moral force against it as many an offence directly punishable by the law.The result, then, of torture is a matter of temperament, of calculation, which varies with each man according[152] to his strength and sensibility; so that by this method a mathematician might solve better than a judge this problem: ¡®Given the muscular force and the nervous sensibility of an innocent man, to find the degree of pain which will cause him to plead guilty to a given crime.¡¯ç”Ÿç”£é‡ã‚’減らã™ã“ã¨ãªãã€ç”Ÿç”£èƒ½åŠ›ã‚’å¢—å¼·ã™ã‚‹ãªã©ã€ãŠå®¢æ§˜ã®ã”è¦æœ›ã«ãŠå¿œãˆã§ãã‚‹ã‚½ãƒªãƒ¥ãƒ¼ã‚·ãƒ§ãƒ³ã‚’ã”ææ¡ˆã„ãŸã—ã¾ã™ã€‚
ãŠå®¢æ§˜ã®ãƒ—ãƒã‚»ã‚¹ãƒŽã‚¦ãƒã‚¦ã¨å½“社ã®å›ºæœ‰æŠ€è¡“ã®èžåˆã«ã‚ˆã£ã¦æœ€é©åŒ–ã€åŠ¹çŽ‡åŒ–ã€ã•らã«ã¯ç’°å¢ƒã«å„ªã—ã„è¨å‚™ã‚’実ç¾ã‚’ã„ãŸã—ã¾ã™ã€‚海外ç¾åœ°æ³•人(タイã€ãƒ™ãƒˆãƒŠãƒ )ã«ãŠãã¾ã—ã¦ã‚‚åŒç‰ã®ã‚¨ãƒ³ã‚¸ãƒ‹ã‚¢ãƒªãƒ³ã‚°ãŒæä¾›ã§ãるよã†ã«ã€æœ¬ç¤¾ã®æŠ€è¡“者ã¨é€£æºã—管ç†ã„ãŸã—ã¦ãŠã‚Šã¾ã™ã€‚

※ã“れ以外ã«ã‚‚様々ãªå˜ä½æ“作装置ã€å˜ä½“機器製作ãŒã§ãã¾ã™ã€‚
| æ¥ç¨®?分野 | プラント?è¨å‚™åç§° | æ§‹æˆãƒ—ãƒã‚»ã‚¹ | 付帯è¨å‚™?工事施工 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ファインケミカル | IT関連化å¦å“プラント | å応プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ ã‚éŽåˆ†é›¢ãƒ—ãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 乾燥プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ |
クリーンルームã€å……å¡«ã€ã‚¿ãƒ³ã‚¯ãƒ¤ãƒ¼ãƒ‰ã€ ãƒ¦ãƒ¼ãƒ†ã‚£ãƒªãƒ†ã‚£ã€æ¶ˆç«?防ç«è¨å‚™ã€ 土木?建築ã€è¨ˆå™¨?計装工事〠電気工事 |
| 食å“å·¥æ¥ | æ¾±ç²‰å·¥å ´ | å応プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 分離プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 精製プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 脱水?乾燥プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ |
タンクヤードã€ãƒ¦ãƒ¼ãƒ†ã‚£ãƒªãƒ†ã‚£ã€ 消ç«?防ç«è¨å‚™ã€åœŸæœ¨?建築〠計器?計装工事ã€é›»æ°—工事〠原料å—å…¥?貯蔵è¨å‚™ã€è¨ˆé‡?包装è¨å‚™ |
| 化å¦å·¥æ¥ | åˆæˆæ¨¹è„‚å·¥å ´ > | å応プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 蒸留プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 濾éŽåˆ†é›¢ãƒ—ãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 乾燥プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ |
タンクヤードã€ãƒ¦ãƒ¼ãƒ†ã‚£ãƒªãƒ†ã‚£ã€ 供給è¨å‚™ã€å……å¡«ã€è‡ªå‹•倉庫〠焼å´è¨å‚™ã€å‡ºè·è¨å‚™ |
| 食å“å·¥æ¥ | ç³–åŒ–å·¥å ´ > ï¼ˆç•°æ€§åŒ–ç³–é¡žè£½é€ è¨å‚™ï¼‰ |
液化?糖化プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 濃縮プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 濾éŽ?精製プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ |
タンクヤードã€ãƒ¦ãƒ¼ãƒ†ã‚£ãƒªãƒ†ã‚£ã€ 土木?建築ã€è¨ˆå™¨?計装工事〠電気工事 |
| 環境?リサイクル | 溶剤回åŽãƒ—ラント | 濃縮?調整プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 蒸留プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ |
タンクヤードã€è¨ˆé‡è¨å‚™ã€ ãƒ¦ãƒ¼ãƒ†ã‚£ãƒªãƒ†ã‚£ã€æ¶ˆç«?防ç«è¨å‚™ã€ 計器?計装工事ã€é›»æ°—工事〠原料å—å…¥?貯蔵?出è·è¨å‚™ |
| 無機化å¦å·¥æ¥ | è§¦åª’è£½é€ ãƒ—ãƒ©ãƒ³ãƒˆ (自動車用) |
調åˆãƒ—ãƒã‚»ã‚¹ コーティングプãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 焼æˆãƒ—ãƒã‚»ã‚¹ |
ãƒãƒœãƒƒãƒˆæ¬é€ã‚·ã‚¹ãƒ†ãƒ 〠原料調整?供給装置 |
| 無機化å¦å·¥æ¥ | äºŒæ¬¡é›»æ± ç”¨åŽŸæ–™ 精製プラント |
調整プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ å応プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 分離?濃縮プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 蒸留プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ |
タンクヤードã€ãƒ¦ãƒ¼ãƒ†ã‚£ãƒªãƒ†ã‚£ã€ 土木?建築ã€ç©ºèª¿è¨å‚™ã€é›†å¡µ?局所排気〠計器?計装工事〠電気工事ã€è²¯è”µè¨å‚™ã€è¨ˆé‡?包装è¨å‚™ |
| 新エãƒãƒ«ã‚®ãƒ¼ | ãƒã‚¤ã‚ªã‚¨ã‚¿ãƒŽãƒ¼ãƒ« 大型実証モデルプラント > |
蒸留プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ 脱水プãƒã‚»ã‚¹ |
計器?計装工事ã€é›»æ°—工事 |
| 無機化å¦å·¥æ¥ | æ°´ç´ å›žåŽè¨å‚™ | æ°´ç´ å›žåŽãƒ—ãƒã‚»ã‚¹ | タンクヤードã€å†·å´ã‚·ã‚¹ãƒ†ãƒ 〠計器?計装工事 |
※ç´å…¥å®Ÿç¸¾ã‹ã‚‰ã®ä¸€éƒ¨æŠœç²‹ã¨ãªã‚Šã¾ã™ã€‚ã”計画ä¸ã®è¨å‚™ã€ãƒ—ãƒã‚»ã‚¹ã®å®Ÿç¸¾ã¯ãŠæ°—軽ã«ãŠå•ã„åˆã‚ã›ãã ã•ã„。
※GMP対応ã®åŒ»è–¬å“è£½é€ è¨å‚™ã¨ã—ã¦ãƒãƒªãƒ‡ãƒ¼ã‚·ãƒ§ãƒ³å¯¾å¿œã‚‚å¯èƒ½ã§ã™ã€‚
※海外ã¸ã®ç´å…¥å®Ÿç¸¾ã‚‚ã”ã–ã„ã¾ã™ã®ã§ã€è¨å‚™è¨ˆç”»ã®éš›ã¯æ˜¯éžãŠå£°æŽ›ã‘ãã ã•ã„。
※プラントを構æˆã™ã‚‹å½“社ã®ç‰¹é•·ã‚ã‚‹åŒ–å¦æ©Ÿå™¨ã¯ã“ã¡ã‚‰ã‹ã‚‰ã”覧ã„ãŸã ã‘ã¾ã™ã€‚
ãŠå®¢ã•ã¾ã‹ã‚‰ã®
ãŠå•ã„åˆã‚ã›?サãƒãƒ¼ãƒˆã«é–¢ã—ã¦ã®
ã”連絡を承りã¾ã™ã€‚